Palm Oil Economics

Illustrated special edition | Fourteen A4 pages

The Palm Oil History

The story
of a fruit
that changed
the world

The Palm Oil History

The global newspaper dedicated to the past, present and future of palm oil

Special inaugural
edition
Engraved oil-palm fruit, cut fruit and red palm oil
Vol. 1 · No. 1Saturday, May 18, 2024Price: One Dollar

From forest food to global commodity

Five Thousand Years
in a Single Fruit

How one African fruit travelled through ancient trade, Atlantic commerce, industrial Europe and Asian plantation science to become the world’s most widely used vegetable oil.

Engraved montage of oil-palm fruit, West African harvesting, ocean trade and a modern mill
One crop, many eras: indigenous knowledge, ocean trade, industrial demand and the modern plantation economy. Editorial reconstruction.

By the editorial desk | Special history correspondent

Palm oil begins not with a refinery or a futures exchange, but with a tree in the rainforests of West and Central Africa. Communities learned to boil and pound its fruit, crack its kernels, ferment its sap and weave its fronds long before written records. That knowledge created two oils and a household economy from a single palm.

Over centuries the oil moved farther: perhaps to ancient Egypt, certainly along Atlantic routes, then in wooden casks to the soap works and factories of industrial Europe. In 1848 seedlings planted at Bogor in Java opened a second geography. Plantation breeding, mills and refineries eventually made Indonesia and Malaysia the centre of a global trade.

No other oil crop combines such high yield with such a complicated human and environmental history.

This edition follows that history without reducing it to either triumph or indictment. Palm oil has supported food security, industry and millions of livelihoods. Its expansion has also been tied to forest loss, unequal power and difficult labour. Both realities belong in the same newspaper.

The details matter. The oil in an ancient jar, a cask at an African port, a bar of Victorian soap and a modern packet of biscuits belong to one connected story, but each was produced by different people, institutions and technologies.

Science multiplied the crop's yield; trade made its origin difficult to see; policy turned it into fuel; and satellite evidence made distant land conversion visible to buyers. At every stage, new uses altered the balance of power along the chain.

Read together, these pages show why palm oil cannot be understood only as a product. It is also a history of indigenous knowledge, empire, industrial chemistry, rural development and the choices made about tropical land.

Inside this edition

The Palm Oil HistoryA history of ingenuity, trade and consequence1
Saturday, May 18, 2024The Palm Oil HistoryPage 2 of 14

Origins | Prehistory to antiquity

Part I | The fruit of the Guinea Coast

The Forest Was the First Mill

The first technology of palm oil was a body of knowledge: when to harvest, how long to boil, how to separate the pulp and how to use every part of the tree.

The African oil palm, Elaeis guineensis, evolved in the humid belt stretching from the Gulf of Guinea into the Congo Basin. It thrives where sunlight reaches disturbed forest, river margins and village clearings. Long before plantation rows, people encouraged useful palms within a living mosaic of forest and farm.

Its abundance around settlements records a long relationship between people and landscape. Management did not always resemble a planted field: productive palms could be protected, competing growth cleared and access to valued groves organised through families and communities. Wild groves also preserve a much deeper natural history than any plantation.

The plum-sized orange drupes yield deep red-orange palm oil from their fleshy mesocarp. The seed contains a second, paler and chemically different palm kernel oil. Sap becomes palm wine; fronds become roofs and baskets; fibres and shells become fuel. The palm was food, material, medicine and ceremony before it was an export commodity.

Processing demanded judgement at every stage. Fruit had to be softened, pounded and washed; oil was skimmed and clarified; kernels were dried and cracked. The quality of the result depended on timing, heat and knowledge carried through practice rather than written instruction.

Palaeobotanical evidence suggests that people did more than gather wild fruit. By protecting useful palms and opening the canopy around them, communities encouraged productive groves without imposing the regular rows associated with later plantations.

The tree also carried social meaning. Palm wine marked hospitality, rites of passage and ceremony; palms appeared in proverb and oral memory; red oil enriched staple dishes; and rights to trees and groves could express family and community relationships. Commodity history rests on this older cultural landscape.

West African community harvesting and processing oil-palm fruit in a forest grove
Knowledge before industry: harvesting, boiling and pounding palm fruit in a managed forest landscape. Editorial reconstruction.
Archaeologist examining residue in a pottery jar inside an ancient Egyptian tomb at Abydos
Archaeological reconstruction: a residue recovered from a tomb at Abydos, Egypt, and dated to about 3000 BC has been reported as palm oil. The identification remains debated.

Archaeological traces in an Egyptian tomb

A residue recovered from a tomb at Abydos and dated to roughly 3000 BC has often been identified as palm oil. The identification is difficult and remains contested, but it raises a compelling possibility: a portable, valued oil may have travelled thousands of kilometres from its African home to the Nile Valley.

What is certain is that palm oil was embedded in regional life across West and Central Africa. It flavoured staple dishes, lit lamps, treated skin, sealed social obligations and accompanied ritual. Later traders encountered not a raw resource waiting to be discovered, but a mature technology refined over generations.

Because the fruit loses quality after harvest, production remained tied to place. That same biological constraint would later determine the location of industrial mills: the machinery could grow larger, but it still had to meet the fruit quickly.

No surviving label identifies the contents of the Abydos vessel. Researchers work from the residue's chemistry, the securely dated tomb context and comparison with known fats, then judge which botanical source best fits evidence altered by five millennia.

The commodity story begins with indigenous expertise, not with European demand.
The Palm Oil HistoryA history of ingenuity, trade and consequence2
Saturday, May 18, 2024The Palm Oil HistoryPage 3 of 14

Atlantic trade | 15th to 19th century

Part II | Commerce, coercion and industry

Oil Rivers, Empire and Europe’s Factories

Palm oil crossed the Atlantic as food and cultural memory, then returned to Europe as the industrial fat of soap, candles, tin plate and machines.

African merchants and workers loading palm-oil casks at a nineteenth-century Niger Delta port
The Oil Rivers trade joined inland producers, African merchant houses, coastal middlemen and European shipping. Editorial reconstruction.

Portuguese and later Dutch, British and French traders recorded palm oil as a staple of West African coastal economies. It travelled aboard ships as food, while enslaved Africans carried culinary knowledge of red palm oil to Brazil, the Caribbean and other parts of the Americas.

After Britain abolished its slave trade in 1807, merchants and reformers promoted trade in goods as so-called legitimate commerce. Palm oil became its emblem. British imports rose from modest quantities to tens of thousands of tonnes a year as buyers sought affordable, stable and versatile fats.

The transition was neither clean nor bloodless. Competition shaped African politics, diplomacy and warfare, while commercial pressure drew European powers deeper into the region. In 1885 Britain proclaimed the Oil Rivers Protectorate, and colonial administrations and firms increasingly controlled routes and terms of trade.

European demand did not create an industry from nothing. It enlarged and redirected African systems of cultivation, processing and exchange. Inland producers, canoe transporters, brokers and coastal merchant houses formed a long chain before a cask ever reached an ocean vessel.

Credit, prices and access to shipping shifted power along that chain. As imperial control tightened, the language of free commerce increasingly concealed unequal contracts and political force.

By the century's end, an export once presented as morally redemptive had helped create the commercial routes, political interventions and colonial institutions that narrowed African control over the trade.

Why the delta became the Oil Rivers

The Niger Delta offered waterways linking inland groves to the Atlantic. Casks moved by canoe to coastal depots and ocean-going ships. African merchant houses and trading states could command substantial power, but colonial rule gradually displaced them and reorganised taxation, transport and contracts around European firms.

European industry captured much of the value added by refining and manufacture. African producers supplied the material through labour-intensive systems of harvesting, boiling, pounding and clarification.

Production remained dispersed across households and villages. Traders aggregated many small consignments into the large cargoes recorded at European ports.

Fresh oil moved from inland paths to creek-side markets, then into casks suitable for canoe and ocean transport. Quality, water content and spoilage affected the price at every exchange.

Coastal merchant houses extended credit and organised transport long before colonial administrations claimed authority over the delta. Their commercial power challenged the later European effort to deal directly with producers.

Taxes, treaties and military force gradually changed who could set the terms. The Oil Rivers name survived, but the autonomy of many African intermediaries did not. Farther west, producing regions in present-day Ghana, Benin and Nigeria were drawn into the same contested coastal economy.

The cask was the unit visible in European records, but behind it stood a dispersed production system whose household labour and local expertise rarely appeared in the account books.

Victorian soap and candle factory processing imported oils
Inside the industrial appetite: soap frames, candle moulds and imported oil casks in a late-Victorian works. Editorial reconstruction.

The fat that greased a revolution

Palm oil helped make hard soap, clean-burning candles and the flux used in tin-plating. It lubricated machinery and railways. Palm kernel oil later became especially valuable to soap makers because it lathered readily.

These uses linked a tropical forest product to hygiene, preserved food, urban lighting and mechanised production. They also made control of supply a strategic industrial concern.

Factories separated, blended and chemically transformed tropical fats for specialised uses. The industrial value therefore accumulated far from the communities that harvested and processed the original fruit.

Soap makers valued palm oil for a firm bar and palm-kernel oil for its ready lather. Candle makers blended tropical fats with other materials to manage hardness, burn and cost.

Tin-plating and lubrication linked the oil to preserved food and railway expansion. Demand no longer depended on one fashionable product; several growing industries supported the trade at once.

Refining and, later, hydrogenation widened the range again by controlling colour, flavour and melting point. The fruit was becoming a family of industrial ingredients rather than a single crude oil.

Reformers imagined oil replacing the trade in people; empire made the oil trade one of its instruments.
The Palm Oil HistoryA history of ingenuity, trade and consequence3
Saturday, May 18, 2024The Palm Oil HistoryPage 4 of 14

Industrial appetite | The 19th century

Part III | Soap, candles and machines

The Oil That Greased the Revolution

Europe's factories found in palm oil a cheap, stable and versatile fat for hygiene, lighting, preserved food and mechanised transport.

Nineteenth-century soap factory in England
Soap works in England, c. 1890: imported palm oils became raw material for mass hygiene. Editorial reconstruction.

Industrial Europe needed fats on an unprecedented scale. Palm oil was semi-solid in temperate climates, resisted rancidity and could perform several jobs at once. Demand grew in Britain, France and Germany as factories, cities and consumer markets expanded.

Soap was foremost. The nineteenth-century revolution in public hygiene created an enormous market, and palm and palm-kernel oils made hard, mild bars that lathered well. Companies built around imported tropical oils later became some of the world's largest consumer-goods businesses.

Industrial demand explains why West African exports rose so dramatically and why European powers treated reliable access to producing regions as a strategic concern. The pursuit of cheap fat shaped commerce and, eventually, colonial policy.

Value accumulated unevenly. African households supplied carefully processed oil, but European refiners and manufacturers controlled blending, branding and the profitable transformation into finished goods.

Palm oil's usefulness began with physical properties. It was firm enough for soap and candles, stable enough for transport and capable of being refined into a more neutral ingredient. Palm-kernel oil added a second chemistry from the same fruit.

Large works bought casks from many origins, tested and blended their contents, and standardised a variable agricultural material for repetitive factory production. Consistency itself became a source of value.

Factory chemistry did not replace the qualities of the original oils; it reorganised them. Hardness, lather, burn, lubrication and melting behaviour became specifications that could be purchased, tested and reproduced.

Candles, light and tallow

Before gas and electric lighting became widespread, candles were essential to homes, workshops and public buildings. Palm oil offered candle makers a dependable partner or alternative to animal tallow and could be blended for a cleaner, more consistent burn.

This market joined a West African forest fruit to the daily rhythm of European urban life. Palm-kernel oil's distinct chemistry was particularly useful where hard fats and ready lather were needed.

As towns grew, lighting and washing ceased to be occasional luxuries and became mass markets. Soap boilers and chandlers required steady supplies whose scale could no longer be met by local animal fats alone.

Wooden casks therefore connected dispersed African processors with increasingly concentrated European factories. The factory transformed not only the oil, but also where profit and technical authority accumulated.

Kernel oil became especially valuable for soaps expected to foam in hard or salty water. Refiners learned to combine it with other fats so a bar could balance lather, firmness and price.

Even after gas lighting spread, candles remained important for portable light, religious use and households beyond the gas network. The market narrowed gradually rather than disappearing at once.

Soap demand proved more durable. Rising urban populations, public-health campaigns and branded household goods carried tropical oils into an expanding mass market.

Victorian workers tin-plating iron sheets beside stacks of preserved-food cans
Palm oil served as a flux during tin-plating, part of the process behind the preserved-food can. Editorial reconstruction.

Tin plate, railways and food

Palm oil served as a flux in tin-plating, helping coat iron for the cans that transformed food preservation. It also lubricated machinery and railways when dependable industrial lubricants were urgently needed.

Advances in refining removed colour and odour. Hydrogenation later allowed oils to be hardened, moving palm oil beyond soap and candles into margarine, shortening and mass-produced food.

These uses tied palm oil to three signatures of industrial modernity: mechanised transport, longer-lasting food and manufactured household goods. Demand rose because one oil could solve several technical problems.

Securing that supply became a strategic commercial concern. Industrial appetite and imperial expansion were not identical, but they increasingly reinforced one another along the palm-growing coast.

Tin-coated cans separated food from air and contamination, allowing factories and armies to store provisions longer and move them farther. Palm oil's role was small in volume but strategically useful in the manufacturing process.

As mineral lubricants improved, palm oil's role in machinery changed, yet refining and food manufacture opened new markets. Industrial chemistry kept reinventing demand rather than allowing one obsolete use to end the trade.

Soap, light and preserved food all rested in part on a tropical fruit oil.
The Palm Oil HistoryA history of ingenuity, trade and consequence4
Saturday, May 18, 2024The Palm Oil HistoryPage 5 of 14

Transplantation | 1848 to mid-20th century

Part IV | The palm goes east

Four Seedlings and a Continental Shift

A quiet botanical experiment in Java supplied the genetics for a plantation economy that would move the centre of production across the Indian Ocean.

Garden workers and botanists planting young oil palms at Bogor Botanic Garden
Bogor, 1848: the transplantation that changed the geography of palm oil. Editorial reconstruction.

A garden experiment

In 1848 oil-palm seedlings were planted at the Bogor Botanic Garden, then known as Buitenzorg, in the Dutch East Indies. Their descendants, distributed through Sumatra's Deli region, became the celebrated Deli palms. Their narrow genetic base and unusually productive fruit shaped breeding material used across much of the later Asian industry.

For decades palms served as ornament and experiment. Commercial estates followed in the early twentieth century in Sumatra and then Malaya. Roads, railways, ports and mills made large-scale exports possible.

Early twentieth-century oil-palm estate with workers and narrow-gauge railway
The estate system: uniform rows, organised labour, rail and a mill close to the fruit. Editorial reconstruction.

Plantation logic

The Asian industry differed from the semi-wild groves and smallholder production that had long characterised West Africa. Estates planted selected material in regular blocks, standardised harvest cycles and built mills beside the fields. Scientific management raised output and lowered unit costs.

This system was built within colonial economies and depended on controlled land and labour. Its productivity cannot be separated from those institutions. After independence, Malaysia and Indonesia adapted and expanded the estate model through public schemes, private companies and millions of smallholders.

1848Seedlings planted at Bogor
1910sCommercial estates expand in Sumatra and Malaya
Mid-centuryTenera breeding and better milling accelerate yields
Late centuryAsia becomes the centre of world production
A crop domesticated in Africa over millennia was industrialised in Asia within decades.
The Palm Oil HistoryA history of ingenuity, trade and consequence5
Saturday, May 18, 2024The Palm Oil HistoryPage 6 of 14

Botany and milling | The yield revolution

Part V | From fruit to ingredient

More Oil From Less Land

Palm fruit deteriorates within hours. That biological clock anchors mills to the landscape and explains the crop's unusual industrial geography.

Modern palm-oil mill and refinery receiving fresh fruit bunches
The mill must meet the fruit: a representative view of reception, sterilisation, pressing, storage and refining. Editorial illustration.
1

Harvest

Fresh fruit bunches weighing many kilograms are cut year-round and should reach a mill within about 24 hours.

2

Sterilise

Steam halts enzymes and the rise of free fatty acids while loosening the individual fruit.

3

Digest

Fruit is stripped and mashed to rupture the oil-bearing cells of the pulp.

4

Press

Mechanical pressing releases crude palm oil, which is clarified and dried.

5

Recover kernels

Nuts are separated and cracked; kernels are crushed in a distinct process.

6

Refine and split

Refining removes colour and odour; fractionation separates liquid olein and solid stearin.

The tenera breakthrough

Oil-palm fruit types differ in shell thickness. Shell-less pisifera palms often fruit poorly on their own, but crossing them with thick-shelled dura produces the thin-shelled, thick-pulped tenera. Reliable tenera seed, better nursery practice and field selection transformed yields.

A palm begins bearing within a few years, fruits throughout the year in suitable equatorial conditions and remains commercially productive for roughly a quarter-century. It is usually replanted when height and declining output make harvesting uneconomic.

The bunch contains hundreds of drupes. Their orange mesocarp supplies crude palm oil, while the hard seed contains the chemically distinct palm kernel oil.

Fruit form determines how much of each drupe is shell and how much is oil-bearing pulp. Reliable controlled pollination and careful seed production are therefore essential; an error in planting material can limit a field for decades.

Breeding continues to pursue yield, shorter palms, disease resistance and more efficient harvesting. Because a plantation is a long-lived investment, genetic improvement reaches farms far more slowly than a change in factory equipment.

Two streams of chemistry

Palm oil from the mesocarp and palm kernel oil from the seed enter different refining and oleochemical chains. Fractionation then turns one refined oil into liquid olein, solid stearin and intermediate fractions with tailored melting behaviour.

Refining, bleaching and deodorising produce pale, neutral RBD oil. Olein serves liquid cooking-oil markets; stearin and intermediate fractions supply shortenings, margarine, confectionery, soap and industrial formulations.

Empty fruit bunches, fibre, shells and mill effluent can become compost, fuel, animal feed or biogas when managed carefully, creating a second economy around processing residues.

Palm-kernel crushing follows its own route. The kernels are dried, cracked and pressed, leaving an oil suited to lauric products and a solid meal that can enter animal-feed markets.

Fractionation may be repeated to produce narrower melting ranges. This is how one crude oil becomes frying oil in one market, a bakery fat in another and a hard component for confectionery elsewhere.

The yield paradox

Oil output per hectareIndicative average tonnes of oil per hectare per year
Oil palm3.3
Sunflower0.8
Rapeseed0.7
Soybean0.5

Source: Murphy, 2025, using a 2024 comparison. Actual yields vary by place and management.

The chart explains why substitution can enlarge land pressure, but yield alone is not an environmental verdict. Where crops expand, what habitat they replace and how much oil society consumes still matter.

Because fresh fruit deteriorates quickly, it cannot be stockpiled like grain. The mill remains tied to the landscape, and processing within roughly a day, road access and harvest timing are as important to realised yield as genetics in the field.

The central challenge is to raise output from existing farms, especially ageing smallholdings, without allowing higher profitability to become a reason for new forest conversion.

The Palm Oil HistoryA history of ingenuity, trade and consequence6
Saturday, May 18, 2024The Palm Oil HistoryPage 7 of 14

The post-war boom | 1945 to 2000

Part VI | Malaysia, Indonesia and the yield revolution

How Two Nations Came to Feed the World Its Fat

Government policy, scientific breeding, refining capacity and millions of growers turned Southeast Asia into the centre of a global commodity.

Plantation workers beside a truck carrying fresh oil-palm fruit through a Southeast Asian estate
Plantations, estate roads and rapid fruit collection helped Malaysia and Indonesia supply an expanding world market. Editorial illustration.

The second half of the twentieth century transformed palm oil from a significant tropical export into a global agricultural giant. Malaysia first promoted oil palm to diversify an economy dependent on rubber and tin, expand rural employment and support planned smallholder settlement.

State-backed land schemes, private estates, research institutions, ports and refineries connected cultivation with national development. Settlement programmes ultimately involved hundreds of thousands of settler households and family members; regular harvests supported housing, education and small businesses.

Indonesia's expansion gathered pace later and became larger. Planting spread across Sumatra, Kalimantan and beyond through corporate estates, state enterprises and millions of independent or scheme-linked smallholders.

Indonesia eventually overtook Malaysia. Together the two countries came to supply the dominant share of the world market, giving their harvests and policies exceptional influence over global vegetable-oil prices.

Malaysia also invested in domestic refining, fractionation and research so that more value could be retained after the fruit left the field. Ports and storage linked that processing base directly to importing markets.

Indonesia combined a vast land base with growing domestic consumption. Its later biodiesel programme added another large market alongside food and export demand.

The two national stories were not identical, but both show how a crop expands fastest when breeding, roads, mills, finance, policy and market access advance together.

The machinery of the boom

The crop expanded because policy, science and infrastructure reinforced one another.

Planting material
Reliable tenera seed and better nurseries
Agronomy
Nutrition, pest control and field selection
Processing
Efficient mills close to expanding fields
Value added
Domestic refining and fractionation
Trade
Ports, storage, standard contracts, grades and futures markets
Rural policy
Settlement, roads, credit and extension
Smallholder family harvesting palm fruit and delivering bunches to a collection truck
Small farms and local collection networks were central to the post-war transformation. Editorial illustration.

Science, development and cost

Research improved tenera seed, disease management, fertilisation, harvesting and milling. Tissue culture promised to multiply elite planting material, though practical difficulties made progress uneven.

The boom was not solely a corporate story. Oil palm drew millions of rural families into cash economies and, for many, financed education, housing and new businesses. That record helps explain why producing governments defend the crop strongly.

The same expansion also intensified forest conversion, land conflict and labour concerns. Development success and environmental cost advanced together, and neither belongs outside the history.

Smallholders entered through several arrangements: independent farms, settlement schemes and partnerships tied to a nearby estate or mill. Their returns varied with land quality, debt, seed, transport and the fairness of fruit grading.

In a single lifetime, palm oil went from a colonial export to the cooking oil of choice for billions.
The Palm Oil HistoryA history of ingenuity, trade and consequence7
Saturday, May 18, 2024The Palm Oil HistoryPage 8 of 14

The global commodity | Late 20th century to today

Part VII | The ingredient hidden in plain sight

The Invisible Ingredient in Half the Supermarket

A neutral taste, useful texture and competitive price placed palm-derived ingredients in food, soap, cosmetics, chemicals and fuel across the world.

Palm-oil export terminal, storage tanks, tanker and unbranded consumer goods
From refinery tanks to thousands of formulations: the modern trade connects tropical production with global manufacturing. Editorial illustration.

Walk down a supermarket aisle and palm oil is often present without being obvious. It appears in biscuits, chocolate, instant noodles, margarine, ice cream, bread and countless other foods; in soap, shampoo, detergent, cosmetics and toothpaste; and, as biodiesel, in transport fuel. It is commonly estimated to occur in around half of packaged supermarket products.

USDA's March 2026 forecast places world production at 80.7 million tonnes in 2025/26, with Indonesia and Malaysia supplying about 83 per cent. Their estate expansion, smallholder planting, ports and refineries created the scale behind palm oil's competitive price.

Biology confines commercial cultivation mainly to a humid belt roughly ten degrees north and south of the equator. The industry reaches from Sumatra and Kalimantan to Peninsular Malaysia, Sabah and Sarawak; from Nigeria, Ghana, Cote d'Ivoire, Cameroon and Benin to Colombia and Brazil; and into Papua New Guinea and Solomon Islands.

In food it appears in frying oil, bakery fats, confectionery coatings, spreads and cream fillings. Palm kernel derivatives are important in soap, detergents and personal care. Fatty acids, alcohols, glycerine and esters support industrial chemistry, while biodiesel policies created a major energy market.

The complexity of these chains makes origin hard to see. A shipment may be blended, refined, split and transformed several times before it reaches a finished product.

Large refining hubs near ports connect producing regions with manufacturers across Asia, Europe, Africa and the Americas. Bulk storage and standard specifications allow oil from many plantations and mills to enter a common trade.

Futures prices respond to harvests, weather, competing oilseeds, energy markets, currencies, freight and policy. India's persistent domestic oilseed deficit makes it the largest importing market; China, Europe, Africa and the Middle East are also major destinations. A tariff in New Delhi or an export rule in Jakarta can reach a grower's field.

Concentration brings efficiency but also food-security and logistics risk: drought, export restrictions or port disruption in two leading origins can affect prices worldwide. Traceability must work backwards through refineries, traders and mills to the land where the fruit was grown.

Market figures: USDA Oilseeds: World Markets and Trade, March 2026.

One fruit, many markets

Refining and fractionation allow manufacturers to select texture, melting behaviour and chemical function from a common feedstock.

Food
Cooking oil, bakery fats, confectionery, spreads and shortenings
Home care
Soap noodles, surfactants, detergents and candles
Personal care
Emollients, fatty alcohols, glycerine and texture systems
Industry
Lubricants, coatings, plastics additives and oleochemicals
Energy
Biodiesel, renewable-diesel feedstock and biomass residues
Animal feed
Palm-kernel expeller and other carefully managed processing co-products
Heat and power
Fibre, shells and biogas recovered at mills
Grocer arranging unbranded food, soap, personal-care products and candles made with palm-derived ingredients
Hidden in plain sight: one agricultural feedstock becomes foods, cleansers, cosmetics and household goods. Editorial illustration.

Livelihoods at the first mile

Millions of smallholders grow oil palm, often alongside other crops and income sources. The crop can provide regular harvests and cash flow, but returns depend on seed quality, access to mills, transport, prices and the bargaining power of growers.

Because fruit must be processed quickly, farmers are tied to nearby buyers. Better cooperatives, transparent grading, replanting finance and independent access to improved planting material can determine whether the crop builds resilience or dependence.

Ageing palms create a difficult interval: yields decline, but replanting removes income while new trees mature. Credit and temporary livelihood support can decide whether a family renovates its plot or postpones the investment.

The first mile is therefore economic as well as physical. Roads, collection schedules, weighing practices and clear price information shape how much of the crop's value reaches the grower.

A mill can accept fruit from hundreds or thousands of farms, then blend their oil into a common stream. That efficiency makes individual origin difficult to preserve unless records begin at the collection point.

The hidden ingredient in the supermarket therefore begins with visible local relationships: who owns the trees, who weighs the bunches, who controls the nearest mill and who carries the risk of replanting.

The Palm Oil HistoryA history of ingenuity, trade and consequence8
Saturday, May 18, 2024The Palm Oil HistoryPage 9 of 14

Food, fuel and health | The oil in everyday life

Part VIII | From the frying pan to the fuel tank

One Oil, Three Modern Debates

Palm oil's chemistry made it useful in food and personal care; energy policy made it a fuel; nutrition science made it a health argument.

Engraved scene tracing palm fruit through a mill and biodiesel refinery to a fuel tanker and pump
From fruit bunch to fuel tank: palm oil became part of national energy and industrial policy. Editorial reconstruction.
1

Fresh fruit

Bunches are harvested and rushed to a nearby mill.

2

Crude oil

Sterilising, digesting and pressing release crude palm oil.

3

Biodiesel

Oil reacts with methanol and a catalyst to make fuel.

4

Blend

Palm biodiesel is mixed with petroleum diesel for transport.

Why governments chose biodiesel

Producing countries used blending mandates to absorb domestic output, support farm prices and reduce dependence on imported fossil fuel. Palm biodiesel contains little sulphur and can lower some tailpipe pollutants.

The climate result depends on land. Fuel from established plantations differs greatly from fuel linked to fresh forest conversion or drained peat, where land-use emissions can erase the benefit of replacing diesel.

Some importing regions later restricted palm-based biofuel, turning carbon accounting into a dispute over trade, energy security and development.

Blend mandates can redirect millions of tonnes between export, food and domestic fuel markets. That makes energy policy a powerful influence on prices paid by refiners, food manufacturers and growers.

The fairest comparison measures the full life cycle: cultivation, fertiliser, milling, transport, refinery energy and any carbon released when land use changes.

Mill residues can also supply heat, electricity or biogas, changing the energy balance of the processing system. Poorly managed effluent, however, can create methane and water pollution instead of a benefit.

The fuel debate is therefore a land and systems debate, not a verdict that follows automatically from the word renewable.

Policy can change faster than plantations. A mandate announced in a capital may immediately alter refinery runs and export availability, while the palms supplying that decision were planted years earlier and will remain productive for decades.

The nutrition argument

Palm oil is approximately 50 per cent saturated, 39 per cent monounsaturated and 11 per cent polyunsaturated fat. Replacing saturated fat with unsaturated fat generally lowers LDL cholesterol and cardiovascular risk; replacing it with refined carbohydrate does not offer the same benefit.

Unrefined red palm oil contains carotenes and tocotrienols. Refined oil is pale, neutral and stable, but high-temperature refining can create contaminants that processors and food-safety authorities seek to minimise.

Because palm oil is naturally semi-solid, it also helped manufacturers replace partially hydrogenated oils and their artificial trans fats.

Red palm oil has been used in some settings to improve vitamin A intake, while most globally traded oil is refined for a neutral colour and flavour. Those products should not be treated as nutritionally identical.

The sensible conclusion is contextual rather than absolute: consider the amount eaten, the refining method, the total diet and the alternative fat that would replace it.

Food safety and nutrition are separate questions. Refiners can reduce process contaminants through temperature and equipment control, while dietary advice concerns the pattern and quantity of fats eaten over time.

A fair comparison asks whether palm oil replaces trans fat, butter, another tropical oil or a more unsaturated liquid oil; each substitution changes the nutritional result.

That is why a single verdict on palm oil and health is misleading. The same crop can appear as minimally processed red oil in a local dish, a refined frying medium or one fraction within a manufactured filling, each with a different dietary setting.

From toothpaste to tarmac

Snack foods, non-dairy creamers, infant formula, soap, shampoo, lotions, creams, lipstick, detergent, candles, lubricants and fuel may contain palm oil or a derivative. Much of this presence hides under oleochemical names such as fatty alcohols, surfactants, emulsifiers and esters.

Substitution is difficult because one replacement may not supply the same melting point, stability, texture and lather. Removing palm can require redesigning an entire formulation.

Fractionation is the key to that reach. Liquid olein suits cooking and frying, harder stearin supports bakery and confectionery fats, and kernel-derived chemicals supply cleansing and personal-care products.

This technical versatility explains why a simple label change cannot solve the land-use question. Reform must reach refiners, traders and plantations rather than stop at the name printed on a packet.

Ingredient lists may name derivatives rather than their agricultural origin, especially after fatty acids have been transformed into surfactants, emulsifiers or esters.

That invisibility is commercial as well as linguistic: oil from many mills can be blended before it reaches a brand, making traceability a record-keeping challenge across several transformations.

It is neither a poison nor a health food; processing, quantity and dietary context matter.
The Palm Oil HistoryA history of ingenuity, trade and consequence9
Saturday, May 18, 2024The Palm Oil HistoryPage 10 of 14

The environmental reckoning | Forests, peat and people

Part IX | The price of abundance

The Argument Over Abundance

The modern argument is not whether palm oil has impacts, but which impacts occur where, who bears them, and which reforms can be verified rather than merely promised.

Rapid expansion has converted forests and peatlands in parts of Southeast Asia, releasing carbon and fragmenting habitat. Fire and drainage can extend the damage far beyond a plantation boundary. The consequences made palm oil a symbol of the wider struggle over tropical land use.

Drained peat exposes centuries of stored carbon to decomposition and long-burning fire. Smoke from major fire seasons has produced transboundary haze and public-health emergencies affecting millions of people across Southeast Asia.

Yet replacing palm oil with lower-yielding oils without reducing demand could require more land elsewhere. The useful question is therefore not simply palm or no palm, but how much oil society consumes, where new production occurs, how existing land is improved and whether forests and community rights are protected.

Forests and climate

Peat drainage, fire and forest conversion create the largest climate risks. Protection of high-carbon and high-conservation-value areas, restoration and better use of existing plantations matter more than public relations claims.

A uniform plantation is not ecologically equivalent to rainforest. Conversion reduces habitat for orangutans, tigers, elephants, rhinos and less visible species, while drainage and field infrastructure can alter water flow and soil condition.

Riparian buffers, wildlife corridors and protected forest patches can reduce damage within a producing landscape, but they do not make newly cleared primary forest replaceable.

The most important distinction is between raising output on established agricultural land and expanding into intact or carbon-rich ecosystems.

Fire prevention also depends on water management, local response capacity and incentives that do not reward clearing. A satellite can reveal smoke; it cannot by itself keep peat wet.

People and labour

Land disputes, insecure work, migrant recruitment, forced labour, child labour and gendered tasks can be obscured in long supply chains. Effective standards require worker voice, community participation and accessible remedy.

Customary land may look empty on a concession map while supplying food, water, forest materials and cultural identity. Consent and secure tenure therefore belong at the centre of responsible land development.

Plantation work includes harvesting heavy bunches, collecting loose fruit and applying inputs, each with distinct safety and pay risks. Informal or temporary status can make those risks harder to report.

Grievance systems matter only when workers and communities can use them without retaliation and when verified harm leads to remedy rather than another audit alone.

Recruitment fees, withheld documents and unclear piece rates can turn ordinary labour dependence into serious abuse. Worker organisations and independent investigation make those risks harder to conceal.

Rainforest, river, conservation buffer and established oil-palm landscape under field monitoring
The frontier question: production, protected habitat and credible monitoring must occupy the same landscape. Editorial illustration.

Yield and substitution

Oil palm produces several times more oil per hectare than major annual oilseeds. Replacing it without reducing demand could shift and enlarge land pressure. The conservation goal is high yield on existing farms without new forest or peat conversion.

Yield comparisons do not excuse harmful expansion; they explain why a blanket substitution can create a different land problem. Location and governance decide whether efficiency becomes conservation or further incentive to clear.

Replanting ageing palms and helping smallholders close yield gaps are among the clearest ways to increase supply without extending the agricultural frontier.

Demand matters as much as substitution. Reducing waste and unnecessary use lowers pressure across every oil crop instead of shifting hectares from one producing region to another.

Certification and law

Certification, corporate commitments, importing-country rules and producer-country policies increasingly demand traceability. Their credibility rests on coverage, enforcement and whether smallholders can comply without exclusion.

Satellite alerts can show where forest changes, but responsibility still depends on accurate concession boundaries, supplier records and investigation on the ground.

Rules must also distinguish deliberate evasion from farmers who lack maps, documents or affordable technical support. A cleaner market cannot be built by exporting compliance costs to the weakest participant.

Producer-country licensing, land law and enforcement remain decisive because importing markets see only part of the trade. Reform is strongest when domestic rules and buyer requirements reinforce one another.

The future will be decided less by slogans than by land records, mill lists, worker testimony and what satellites can see.
The Palm Oil HistoryA history of ingenuity, trade and consequence10
Saturday, May 18, 2024The Palm Oil HistoryPage 11 of 14

Reform and traceability | Standards, law and evidence

Part X | Can palm oil be made clean?

From Promise to Proof

Certification, corporate pledges, national standards, import rules and satellite monitoring all try to break the link between palm oil and harm.

An architecture of reform grew in response to forest loss and social criticism. Its best-known institution is the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil, which brings growers, processors, manufacturers, retailers, banks and civil-society groups into a shared certification system.

Standards address deforestation, peat, labour, community rights and traceability. Producing countries also created national schemes, while major buyers announced no-deforestation, no-peat and no-exploitation policies.

Audits and chain-of-custody systems allow certified oil to be sold through different models. Each offers a different degree of physical connection between a product claim and the plantation where fruit was grown.

Certification and its limits

Progress has been real but uneven. Critics point to incomplete coverage, weak enforcement and cases where a sustainable label outran evidence on the ground. Certification works best when grievances are investigated, non-compliance has consequences and public reporting permits scrutiny.

Different chain-of-custody models make different promises. Segregated oil preserves a physical certified stream, mass balance allows controlled mixing, and certificate systems support certified production without tracing the oil in a particular packet.

No model is useful if the underlying audit misses land conflict or poor labour conditions. The credibility of the label depends on the quality of evidence beneath it.

Standards also evolve. Stronger rules on peat, forest conversion and worker rights matter only when older plantations, new developments and independent suppliers are all brought within effective oversight.

Buyer pledges and national systems

Large traders and consumer brands translated public pressure into no-deforestation, no-peat and no-exploitation policies. Because a handful of firms handle enormous volumes, their supplier rules can reach far beyond a certified product line.

Producer countries developed national certification and licensing systems of their own. These can cover a broader domestic base than voluntary schemes, but their strength depends on legal clarity, field capacity and credible sanctions.

Price premiums alone have rarely paid for every change. Long-term purchasing, technical support and replanting finance can matter more to a farmer than a small payment attached to one certified tonne.

Claims also differ in scope. A company may certify selected plantations, purchase certificates for a brand or require all suppliers to meet a corporate policy. Readers should ask which promise is actually being made.

When a complaint succeeds

A credible grievance process identifies harm, protects complainants, publishes findings and follows remedy to completion. Suspending a supplier can protect a buyer's claim, but it does not by itself restore land or repay workers.

The strongest systems learn from complaints: they change purchasing practice, improve maps and revisit sites where an audit gave false confidence.

Independent auditor, woman smallholder and mill representative checking a parcel map and supply ledger beside tagged palm-fruit bunches
From promise to proof: parcel maps, supply records, field evidence and protected waterways make traceability testable. Editorial illustration.

Law, satellites and testimony

Import rules increasingly demand evidence that commodities are not linked to recent deforestation. Satellite alerts identify clearing, while mill lists and concession maps connect land change to buyers.

Remote sensing cannot verify wages, consent or recruitment. Credible proof combines maps, purchase records, audits, worker testimony, community grievances and action when evidence contradicts a claim.

Traceability commonly begins at the mill because fresh fruit travels only a limited distance. The harder step is mapping every estate, dealer and independent farm that can deliver to that mill.

Public supplier lists allow researchers and communities to compare company claims with independent evidence, turning transparency into a continuing process rather than a one-time certificate.

Include the smallholder

Small farmers can struggle with mapping, records and certification costs. Group systems, cooperative services, replanting finance and public extension are essential if cleaner markets are not to exclude the people least able to absorb new costs.

Support must improve the farm as well as the file: secure tenure, reliable seed, safer work, transparent prices and access to mills make compliance economically durable.

When standards create market access and better productivity, they can reward reform. When they create paperwork without value, participation will remain shallow.

Group certification can spread mapping, training and audit costs across many farms. Cooperatives can also strengthen bargaining over fruit grading, transport and the timing of mill collection.

Exclusion carries its own risk. If demanding markets accept only well-documented estates, less visible fruit may move into opaque domestic or export channels rather than disappear from production.

Responsible production needs no deforestation, protected rights, fair work and evidence strong enough to be tested.
The Palm Oil HistoryA history of ingenuity, trade and consequence11
Saturday, May 18, 2024The Palm Oil HistoryPage 12 of 14

Rules of the market | Voluntary certification and binding law

Part XI | RSPO, EUDR and the burden of proof

A Certificate Is Not a Passport

One system sets a voluntary sustainability standard; the other makes deforestation due diligence a legal condition of access to the European Union market.

Mapped oil-palm plot, tagged fruit, mill, refinery, cargo ship and European port inspection linked through shipment records
From plot to port: certification can organise evidence, but EUDR compliance follows each covered shipment and every production origin. Editorial illustration.
1997-98Fires and NGO campaigns sharpen concern over plantation-linked deforestation.
8 Apr. 2004RSPO is formally established as a voluntary multi-stakeholder association.
31 Dec. 2020EUDR deforestation cut-off: later conversion cannot supply covered products.
2026-27Rules apply from 30 Dec. 2026 for large and medium firms; 30 June 2027 for most small and micro firms.

Why RSPO came into existence

The catastrophic fires of 1997 and 1998 made the environmental cost of plantation expansion impossible for consumer companies, producers and campaigners to ignore. WWF's campaign linking burning forests to everyday goods added commercial pressure for a common response.

Producers, processors, manufacturers, retailers, investors and civil society built a roundtable rather than a government regulator. RSPO was formally established in 2004 to define auditable principles for more sustainable production and create demand for Certified Sustainable Palm Oil.

Its scope extends beyond deforestation to peat, biodiversity, labour, community rights, transparency and improvement. Membership and certification are voluntary, however, and enforcement rests on standards, audits, complaints and market consequences rather than public law.

SG and MB are not the same claim

SG | Segregated

Certified oil from several RSPO-certified sources may be mixed together, but it is kept physically separate from ordinary palm oil throughout the supply chain. The product contains certified material, although it need not come from one identified mill.

MB | Mass Balance

Certified and ordinary palm oil may be physically mixed. Each site controls certified input and output quantities in its accounts. The claim is that the purchase supports certified production, not that every unit in the delivered product came from a certified source.

Identity Preserved keeps one certified source separate. RSPO Credits support certified production without tracing certified material through the physical product.

Can RSPO replace EUDR? No.

EU guidance allows certification and third-party verification to support an operator's risk assessment. It also says they cannot substitute for the operator's due-diligence responsibility and do not create a green lane. The EU operator remains liable for the covered product.

RSPO and EUDR ask overlapping but different questions. RSPO assesses performance against a voluntary sustainability standard. EUDR tests a legal cut-off, production-country legality, shipment information and plot-level traceability for products entering or leaving the EU market.

SG is a stronger physical starting point than MB because ordinary oil is excluded. Even SG does not remove the need to obtain the required plot data, test legality and connect the evidence to the quantity covered by a due diligence statement.

Where the bottlenecks sit

Mass Balance: conventional inputs may be mixed into the physical stream. EUDR does not accept mixing known origin with unknown origin; every possible source must be known and assessed.

Smallholders: mapping plots, proving tenure and keeping records can be expensive, especially where fruit passes through dealers before reaching a mill.

Data continuity: geolocation and legality evidence must survive aggregation, refining, fractionation, derivatives and changes of ownership without losing the link between quantity and origin.

Different evidence: an RSPO audit may help, but companies must still check alignment with the EUDR cut-off, definitions, chain-of-custody controls and national-law requirements.

Official desk references: RSPO history | RSPO supply-chain models | EUDR legal text | EU certification guidance | Current application dates. Status checked 14 July 2026.

The Palm Oil HistoryA history of ingenuity, trade and consequence12
Saturday, May 18, 2024The Palm Oil HistoryPage 13 of 14

Africa and the future | Production, trade and export potential

Part XII | A broader geography of world supply

Africa Joins the Palm Oil Leaders

African producers are expanding capacity to join Indonesia and Malaysia as major suppliers, with the opportunity to build a larger and more competitive export industry.

West African smallholders, cooperative quality inspection, village mill and protected landscape
Building a larger African industry: better planting material, cooperative strength, efficient milling and export growth that protects forests and communities. Editorial illustration.

From leading origin to importer

West and Central Africa remain the oil palm's biological and cultural home. The region supplied the nineteenth-century Atlantic trade, yet some historic producers later became net importers as domestic demand outpaced local output and Southeast Asian supply became cheaper and more consistent.

Production did not disappear. It remained spread across wild and semi-wild groves, village processors, small farms, public estates and private mills. But fragmented collection, ageing palms, uneven seed quality and under-capitalised processing frequently kept yields and extraction rates below their potential.

Nigeria has the continent's largest producing sector. Cote d'Ivoire, Ghana, Cameroon, Benin, Liberia, Sierra Leone and the Democratic Republic of Congo add distinct national industries, each balancing local red-oil traditions with industrial refining and regional trade.

Joining Indonesia and Malaysia

Indonesia and Malaysia will remain central to global supply, but a stronger African industry can join them rather than simply follow them. Diverse production regions can serve growing African demand, widen world supply and create room for African refiners and exporters to compete in higher-value markets.

The production gap is not explained by climate alone. Reliable tenera seed, nurseries, replanting finance, feeder roads, collection schedules, mill maintenance and transparent fruit grading have to advance together. The fruit's biological clock punishes every broken link.

Investment need not mean only large estates. Independent farms, cooperatives, outgrower schemes and modernised village processing can all contribute when land rights are secure and growers share fairly in the value created by better quality.

From producer to exporter

Africa's first opportunity is to replace part of its import dependence with efficient local supply. Export potential follows from reliable surplus volumes, modern refineries, standard contracts, efficient ports, transparent quality and proof that growth respects land rights and forests.

More value can remain near production when countries move beyond crude oil into packaged cooking oil, specialised fractions, soap and oleochemicals. Regional trade can build scale before distant markets are served.

If those foundations advance together, African countries could join Indonesia and Malaysia as major producers and become substantial exporters. Growth on established agricultural land and higher-yielding smallholdings offers the strongest route without repeating avoidable forest loss.

Africa can join the leading producers by closing the productivity and infrastructure gap, not by surrendering the forests and rights that make growth durable.

Editorial close

Three producing regions, one shared responsibility

Palm oil is an African food and livelihood, a legacy of empire, an Asian development story, a global industrial ingredient and an environmental test. Its next era could be shaped by three powerful centres of production: Indonesia, Malaysia and a more competitive group of African producers.

Africa's opportunity is not to repeat every stage of Southeast Asia's expansion. It is to combine its own knowledge and growing markets with productive farms, local value addition, credible traceability and trade infrastructure. Done well, that path can turn rising production into durable export strength.

The Palm Oil HistoryA history of ingenuity, trade and consequence13
Saturday, May 18, 2024The Palm Oil HistoryPage 14 of 14

The reader's desk | Innovation, alternatives and essential terms

Part XIII | Beyond the plantation frontier

The Next Oil Is Still Being Invented

Higher yields, better evidence and oils made by fermentation may change the balance of supply, but none removes the need to govern land, energy and demand.

African and Southeast Asian growers examining oil-palm seedlings beside researchers working with fermentation vessels and oil samples
Parallel futures: better farms and replanting, protected forest, traceable harvests and research into oils made without new plantation land. Editorial illustration.

More from land already farmed

Replanting ageing palms, improving seed, controlling disease and recovering more oil at the mill can raise supply without extending the frontier. Precision mapping and better harvest logistics help close the gap between biological potential and oil actually sold.

The decisive question is who gains access. Smallholders need finance through the unproductive replanting years, reliable nurseries, extension and fair mill terms or the most practical yield gains will remain out of reach.

Breeders are pursuing shorter palms, stronger disease resistance and fruit with more oil-bearing mesocarp. Progress moves slowly because each generation must be tested across climates and a poor planting decision occupies land for decades.

Mills can recover value from fibre, shells, empty bunches and effluent as heat, compost or biogas. Better extraction reduces pressure for hectares, but only careful water, methane and nutrient management turns residues into a genuine gain.

Oils without plantations?

Researchers are engineering yeasts and other microorganisms to convert sugars or waste feedstocks into fats with palm-like properties. Fermentation could tailor melting behaviour and reduce direct pressure for new oil-crop land.

Scale is the bottleneck. Feedstock, energy, vessels, purification and price all carry footprints of their own. Synthetic and microbial oils may first serve specialised products; they are not yet a simple replacement for tens of millions of tonnes of affordable food oil.

Algae, precision fermentation and fats assembled from captured or recycled carbon widen the research field. The nearer-term commercial advantage may be exact functionality: a fat designed for one confectionery, cosmetic or oleochemical use rather than a universal cooking oil.

Every alternative needs a full comparison. Sugar grown on cleared land, fossil-powered fermentation or costly purification can move impacts rather than remove them. Credible claims must count land, energy, water, feedstock and affordability together.

A crop unlikely to disappear

Oil palm's high yield, year-round harvest and vast refining network make abrupt replacement improbable. New oils can supplement supply, while lower waste and more thoughtful formulation can reduce unnecessary demand across every crop.

The durable future is plural: productive existing farms, protected forests and peat, fair labour, credible traceability, diversified producing regions and emerging technologies judged by their full land, energy and social costs.

Diversification also matters within the crop. Stronger African and Latin American sectors can reduce dependence on two origins, provided expansion respects forests, customary land and local food needs instead of reproducing the worst frontier model.

The measure of innovation is not novelty alone. It is whether the next tonne supplies useful food or material with less total harm, shares value fairly and carries evidence that survives scrutiny from field or fermenter to final product.

Reader's glossary | The language used across this edition

Elaeis guineensis
The African oil palm, source of the world's principal palm oil.
FFB
Fresh fruit bunch, the harvested cluster sent rapidly to a mill.
Mesocarp
The orange, oil-bearing flesh surrounding each seed.
Kernel
The seed inside the shell; source of palm kernel oil.
CPO
Crude palm oil pressed from the fruit's mesocarp.
PKO / CPKO
Palm kernel oil, or its crude form, pressed from the seed.
Dura
A thick-shelled fruit form used as a parent in breeding.
Pisifera
A shell-less fruit form that often bears poorly by itself.
Tenera
The thin-shelled dura-pisifera hybrid used commercially.
RBD
Oil that has been refined, bleached and deodorised.
Fractionation
Separating an oil into fractions with different melting points.
Olein
The more liquid fraction of refined palm oil.
Stearin
The higher-melting solid fraction of refined palm oil.
Oleochemicals
Chemicals such as fatty acids and alcohols made from oils.
Peatland
Waterlogged, carbon-rich soil vulnerable to drainage and fire.
RSPO
The Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil.
Mass Balance
A controlled mix of certified and ordinary physical oil.
Segregated
Certified oil kept physically separate from ordinary oil.
Smallholder
A grower farming oil palm on a relatively small holding.
Traceability
Following material and evidence back through mills to plots.
Replanting
Replacing old palms, commonly after about 25 years.
Biodiesel
A diesel substitute made by chemically converting vegetable oil.

The editorial conclusion: palm oil is unlikely to vanish. The task is to produce what remains necessary from better-governed land, make every claim testable and ensure that alternatives solve more problems than they move elsewhere.

Desk references: USDA world oilseed markets, March 2026 | IUCN, Vegetable oils and biodiversity.